Among men, blacks (28.5%) are about six times more likely than whites (4.4%)
to be admitted to prison during their life. Among women, 3.6% of blacks and
0.5% of whites will enter prison at least once. (U.S. Department of Justice)
Based on current rates of incarceration, an estimated 7.9% of black males
compared to 0.7% of white males will enter State of Federal prison by the
time they are age 20 and 21.4% of black males versus 1.4% of white males will
be incarcerated by age 30. (U.S. Department of Justice)
Some have noted that more black men are in prison in America than are in
college. (The Black and White of Justice, Freedom Magazine, Volume 128)
(Article reprinted with permission.)
Black Racist Flash Mobs --Another Elephant in the Living Room
by Jeff Davis
Racially motivated attacks on White people are yet another elephant in this country’s living room that no one is allowed to talk about in polite society. Well, this website values free speech and protecting White people above being polite so we’re going to talk about it here.
If your state doesn't have concealed-carry, you might want to move.
The Chicago Tribune recently ran a piece which actually addressed, in a very snide fashion, something that everybody in the city knows to be the truth: that recent “flash mob attacks” frequently turn out to be hate crimes directed against Whites by blacks.
The Tribune article notes “Here’s my question about the teenagers who have been attacking and robbing people on North Michigan Avenue in recent days: Were they Christians? And if so, what denomination? Baptist? Catholic? Seventh Day Adventist? Those may sound like ridiculous questions. But so is the question raised by many Tribune readers about our coverage: Why aren’t we mentioning that the culprits are black?”
Let me take a wild guess: Crimes by blacks are to be covered up whenever possible because blacks are a politically protected minority and because the media refuses to admit that racially motivated crimes against White people exist.
The article goes on “There are good reasons not to identify the attackers by race. It’s the newspaper’s sound general policy not to mention race in a story, whether about crime or anything else, unless it has some clear relevance to the topic.”
I’d say the systematic terrorizing of a whole race of people is relevant, but I’m just a honky, so what do I know?
The Trib blathers on: “If a reporter goes out and interviews people about the weather, would it make sense for the story to say, ‘Joe Smith, who is black, is hoping for a cool front’? If a pedestrian gets run over by a bicyclist, should the story mention that the rider was white?”
Planned racial terror attacks are not the weather and have nothing to do with bicycles.
Notice the lame false argument they make. If criminals of one race are preying on people of another race, it could be a matter of life and death to get that information out to the public, but the liberals at the Tribune don’t think White lives are worth saving, especially if they have to say something unflattering about their oh-so-precious blacks.
The Tribune notes “In the attack coverage, what difference does race make, unless police are putting out descriptions or sketches in hopes of getting tips from witnesses? Getting beat up for your iPad, I suspect, feels about the same regardless of the color of the thieves. Police don’t seem to think victims were targeted because of their race.”
In view of the fact that a police officer saying such things out loud would result in the Democrat (read communist) mayor of Chicago immediately firing him, I’m not surprised the police don’t say such things.
Notice the Tribune doesn’t point out that if you knew a certain race was robbing White people, that you could avoid becoming a victim by avoiding that race. Of course such self-preserving behavior would be considered “racist”.
The Trib continues “And what good would it do to trumpet the skin color of the thugs? So pedestrians on Michigan Avenue can run away when they see two or more African-Americans?”
Since running away seems to be the only thing Whites are allowed to do to defend themselves in Chicago given the ban on concealed carry in Illinois, I’d say yeah, running away from Blacks would do some good.
Tribune: “Lots of black adolescents and young adults can be found on the Magnificent Mile on any given day. I’d guess at least 95 percent of them are harmless.”
So it’s just the other five percent who will rob, rape, and kill you? Gee, that’s a relief.
And one last snide liberal comment from the Tribune “My question to readers accusing us of political correctness is: Why do you care so much about the attackers’ race? If you fear or dislike blacks, I suppose it would confirm your prejudice. But otherwise, it tells you nothing useful.”
So helping White people avoid a Black crime wave is “nothing useful”. Considering that most of these Tribune writers are White liberals, this pretty much confirms Ann Coulter’s observation that liberalism is a mental illness.
